Oral Health Call to Action

Oral Health Call to Action

Life course immunization call to action image

Integrating Oral Health into Universal Health Coverage: Why It’s Time to End the Divide Between Oral Health and Global NCD Agendas

News

Oct 30, 2025

There is no health without oral health.

For too long, oral health has been treated as an afterthought in global health systems. Yet the evidence is undeniable: oral diseases are among the most prevalent non-communicable diseases (NCDs) worldwide, affecting more than 3.5 billion people. From periodontitis to oral cancers, their links with diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and other chronic conditions are well established.

Now, the World Federation of Public Health Associations (WFPHA) has issued a powerful policy statement: Integrating Oral Health into the Global NCD and UHC Agendas — A Call to Action for Public Health Associations. The message is clear: oral health must be embedded within all national and global health frameworks if we are to achieve health equity and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Oral Health: The Missing Link in Universal Health Coverage

According to the WHO, NCDs account for 41 million deaths annually, representing 71% of all global mortality. Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) bear the heaviest burden; 85% of premature deaths from NCDs occur there. Oral diseases follow this same inequitable pattern, yet remain excluded from most national NCD strategies and Universal Health Coverage (UHC) packages.

This omission undermines prevention, delays early detection, and perpetuates health inequities. As the WFPHA notes, oral health is “a mirror of overall health.” Neglecting it weakens entire health systems.

Why Integration Matters

Integrating oral health into UHC and NCD agendas is more than a moral imperative. It’s smart public health and smart economics. Countries like Thailand and Brazil have shown that embedding oral health into primary care systems reduces disease burden, improves outcomes for chronic conditions, and saves money.

Integrated prevention efforts like reducing tobacco use, sugar consumption, and harmful alcohol intake benefit oral and systemic health. By targeting shared risk factors, countries can create healthier populations and more resilient health systems.

A Call to Action for Public Health Associations

Public health associations (PHAs) sit at the intersection of science, policy, and advocacy. The WFPHA urges them to:

  1. Adopt oral health integration as a strategic priority in your national advocacy agenda.
  2. Advocate with your Ministry of Health to include oral health in NCD strategies, UHC packages, and PHC delivery.
  3. Mobilize interprofessional coalitions that link oral health, NCDs, and health equity.
  4. Monitor and report on your country’s progress toward integration.

By championing integration, PHAs can drive national accountability and ensure that oral health becomes an essential part of primary health care (PHC).

Engaging All Stakeholders: From Policy to Industry

The statement also highlights the crucial role of collaboration among governments, civil society, academia, and the oral hygiene industry by aligning their operations with equitable access, transparent pricing, and responsible marketing.

From Evidence to Action

We have the frameworks from the WHO Global Oral Health Action Plan (2023–2030) to the WHO Oral Health Resolution (2021). The evidence is clear. What’s missing is the political will and operational leadership to act.

Oral health is not a luxury. It is a fundamental human right and an essential component of global health equity.

The time for integrated action is now.

Read the original call to action here. 

Public Mental Health Working Group

Public Mental Health Working Group

Headshots of two people

Public Mental Health Working Group Co-Chairs Interview: Professor Jutta Lindert and Dr. Jonathan Campion

News

Apr 2, 2025

Public mental health is an increasingly recognized component of public health, vital for improving population well-being and addressing inequalities worldwide. In this interview, we speak with Professor Jutta Lindert and Dr. Jonathan Campion, co-chairs of the World Federation of Public Health Associations’ (WFPHA) Public Mental Health Working Group. 

Jutta and Jonathan share their insights, experiences, and visions for advancing public mental health.

Jonathan and Jutta – please introduce yourselves.

Jonathan Campion: I’m Director of Public Mental Health and Consultant Psychiatrist at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust in the UK. I am also co-chair of the Public Mental Health Section at the European Psychiatric Association and chair of the Public Mental Health Special Interest Group at the World Psychiatric Association. At the WFPHA, I co-chair the Public Mental Health Working Group with Professor Jutta Lindert. Additionally, I’m an Honorary Professor of Public Mental Health at the University of Cape Town, South Africa.

Jutta Lindert: I am a Professor of Public Health from Germany, specializing in public mental health. I co-chair the Public Mental Health section of the European Public Health Association (EUPHA), which I founded 20 years ago. Back then, public mental health was rarely discussed, but it is now gaining prominence, not just in Europe but globally. I’m thrilled to see the WFPHA embracing this focus because mental health has historically been on the margins of public health. Today, it’s becoming a central concern.

At the WFPHA, I co-chair the Public Mental Health Working Group with Dr. Jonathan Campion. Additionally, I lead a huge European consortium on Youth Mental Health.

How long have you been part of the World Federation of Public Health Associations (WFPHA)?

Jonathan Campion: The WFPHA Public Mental Health Working Group was launched on  2/5/23 during the 17th World Congress on Public Health in Rome. I co-chair this group with Professor Lindert, and other members include Professor Bettina Borisch, Dr. Marta Caminiti, and Professor Paul Unschuld.

Jutta Lindert:  I first observed the WFPHA’s work around 2002 or 2003 but couldn’t actively participate due to other commitments. Over the years, I have appreciated the Federation’s global perspective, essential for understanding and addressing mental health issues in diverse contexts. Now, I am honored to serve as co-chair for the newly founded Public Mental Health Working Group.

What interested you in entering the public health sector?

Jutta Lindert: My primary motivation has always been to improve the health of populations, particularly those living in vulnerable situations. As a researcher, I focus on identifying and mitigating health risks for these groups. It is very important for me to provide reliable data that can inform policies and actions. We need good science to respond to public health needs. Public health combines research and action—using evidence to reduce risks and improve outcomes for those most in need.

Jonathan Campion: I initially trained as a general practitioner and saw firsthand how pervasive mental health issues were, particularly in underserved settings. I also realized how neglected mental health was and how it both drives and is driven by social determinants. This inspired me to train in psychiatry and then focus on broader public mental health policy and practice. The massive implementation gap struck me for the treatment and prevention of mental health conditions and the promotion of mental well-being and resilience. I’m passionate about supporting the scale implementation of evidence-based public mental health interventions to sustainably reduce the burden of mental health conditions and promote well-being, particularly in marginalized communities.

What does public mental health mean to you?

Jonathan Campion: Public mental health involves a population approach to sustainably reduce the burden of mental health conditions and promote population mental wellbeing and resilience through scale implementation of evidence-based public mental health interventions to prevent associated impacts, treat mental health conditions, prevent mental health conditions, and promote mental well-being and resilience.

Despite the availability of such interventions provided by different sectors, there is a massive implementation gap, particularly in low- and middle-income countries —only a minority of those with mental health conditions receive treatment with negligible coverage of interventions to prevent mental health conditions or promote mental well-being and resilience. Addressing this gap prevents population-scale suffering, improves a range of public health relevant outcomes, and reduces associated economic costs. Public mental health approaches represent a key opportunity for public health. 

Jutta Lindert: As WHO rightly emphasizes, there is no health without mental health. Public mental health is about more than just addressing mental disorders, which affect one-third of the global population during their lifetime. Mental health and mental health conditions need to be understood as a continuum. As symptoms can be identified at an early level, it is crucial to better understand the onset and trajectories of mental health conditions. It also involves fostering resilience and reducing environmental and social risks. Strengthening mental health prepares populations for change and transformation, reducing stigma and promoting openness.

What are your goals and visions for the WFPHA Public Mental Health Working Group?

Jutta Lindert: Our primary goal is to disseminate knowledge and foster collaboration across sectors, disciplines, and countries. We aim to deepen understanding through research and share findings via webinars, summer schools, and other platforms. Ultimately, we want to improve mental health literacy and public mental health outcomes worldwide.

My vision is to work on a global model of mental health and leave more Euro or North American models behind to serve the world’s populations better.

Jonathan Campion: Our Working Group identified the following five key areas:

  1. Support public mental health knowledge, training, and practice.
  2. Integrate public mental health into public health work.
  3. Raise population awareness about mental health and resilience.
  4. Promote collaboration across systems and disciplines.
  5. Support the implementation and research of evidence-based public mental health interventions.

Our actions include fostering cross-sector collaboration, disseminating resources, organizing workshops, and publishing relevant research. For example, on World Mental Health Day 2023, the WFPHA partnered with the World Psychiatric Association and the World Organization of Family Doctors and signed a public mental health statement to advocate for a whole-system approach to address the global public mental health implementation gap. See more here.

Where do you see public mental health in the next five years?

Jutta Lindert: I hope that public health professionals will universally recognize the importance of public mental health in five years. I envision a world where mental health discussions are as normalized as those about physical health, helping to reduce stigma and foster inclusive conversations. Additionally, research on factors contributing to mental health is essential to Public Mental Health. By reducing risk factors, it might be possible to improve mental health.

Jonathan Campion: The next five years present a significant opportunity to address public mental health implementation failure, especially in low- and middle-income countries. We aim to support greater coordination between sectors and evidence-based action to address the public mental health implementation gap across different sectors. By 2030, we hope to have supported measurable progress in closing the public mental health implementation gap and advancing universal health coverage, including for mental health.

What can individuals do to support mental health—for themselves and others?

Jutta Lindert: Supporting others often enhances one’s mental health. Building caring societies and caring relationships is fundamental. We need to be the change we want to see; ethics is crucial to mental health. Alongside well-known strategies like physical activity and sufficient sleep, we need innovative approaches to bridge the gap between mental health needs and available care.

Last comments

Jutta Lindert: It’s crucial to spread mental health awareness across sectors and develop targeted strategies for different age groups. Building resilience and reducing risks can profoundly impact population health. Future research on public mental health should be supported to allow for more evidence-based actions.

How to support others and their own mental health

Jonathan Campion: Mental health affects every family. Promoting literacy about mental health, recognizing early signs of mental health conditions, and understanding preventive strategies are vital. For example, physical activity can effectively address early depression, while smoking cessation has a similar effect on depression as antidepressants. There are also things we can all do to promote our mental well-being. 

Last comments

Jonathan Campion: Mental health intersects with other public health issues, like tobacco use, which disproportionately affects individuals with mental health conditions. Addressing these overlaps can significantly improve population health. Public health practitioners have a particularly important role in understanding what actions are required at different levels to address the implementation failure. This includes informing policymakers about the size of unmet needs and what the most implementable opportunities are to scale up particular interventions that would have maximum population mental health impact as well as a broad range of impacts across other sectors. The WFPHA’s leadership in public mental health is inspiring, and I look forward to working with the WFPHA on this important agenda.

Conclusion

Public mental health is integral to overall health and well-being. As Professors Lindert and Campion highlight, addressing the public mental health implementation gap and fostering collaboration across sectors can sustainably reduce the impact of mental health conditions and promote the population’s mental well-being and resilience. This results in a broad range of relevant public health impacts. The WFPHA Public Mental Health Working Group is poised to play a pivotal role in this global effort.

Working Group Members:

Professor Bettina Borisch: Professor of Public Health at the University of Geneva; CEO of World Federation of Public Health Associations.

Dr Marta Caminiti: Medical Resident in Public Health at University of Perugia, Italy; Co-chair the Public Mental Health Working Group at the World Federation of Public Health Associations.

Dr Jonathan Campion: Director for Public Mental Health and Consultant Psychiatrist at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust; Co-chair of the Public Mental Health Section at the European Psychiatric Association; Chair of the Public Mental Health Special Interest Group at the World Psychiatric Association; Co-chair the Public Mental Health Working Group at the World Federation of Public Health Associations: Honorary Professor of Public Mental Health at the University of Cape Town, South Africa.

Professor Jutta Lindert: Professor of Public Health at University of Emden (Germany); Co-chair of Public Mental Health Section at the European Public Health Association (EUPHA); Co-chair the Public Mental Health Working Group at the World Federation of Public Health Associations.

Gaza Call to Action

Gaza Call to Action

man in black jacket and black cap holding white banner

Gaza’s Public Health Crisis: A Call for Global Action and Justice

News

Sep 12, 2025

Gaza and Palestine’s public health systems are under attack. They’re collapsing. 

Genocide, governance failures, and the ethics of global health are to blame. Since 1967, the World Federation of Public Health Associations (WFPHA) has championed global health equity, evidence-based policy, and international cooperation. 

Today, we stand in solidarity with Palestine and call for urgent action to protect public health, human rights, and international law.

The Collapse of Public Health in Gaza and Palestine

The deliberate destruction of Gaza’s health infrastructure is more than a humanitarian disaster. It’s a violation of medical neutrality, the Geneva Conventions, and the right to health. When hospitals, health workers, and data systems are targeted, silence becomes complicity.

The Devastating Impact on Gaza’s Health System (October 2023 – Present)

While the oppression of Palestinians predates October 2023, the escalation of war crimes, ethnic displacement, and genocide has led to catastrophic outcomes:

These statistics highlight the bleak reality: a deliberate dismantling of public health.

Weaponized Famine and Health as a Target 

Gaza faces manufactured famine, with siege tactics blocking food and medical aid. Children are highlighted because they’re the most innocent. But it’s not just children. Everyone in Gaza is being starved and killed. The elderly, pregnant women, the sick, people with disabilities, ordinary men and women. No one is safe. Starvation isn’t a side effect but rather a weapon of war.  

Legal experts, UN Special Rapporteurs, Amnesty International, and the Lemkin Institute, among several others, confirm this meets the criteria for genocide under international law. Public health has been systematically weaponized through:

  • Bombing hospitals and clinics
  • Blocking medical supplies
  • Destroying vaccination programs and health data
  • Targeting public health education

When is enough, enough? 

Global Health Governance Failures 

Despite Palestine’s observer status at the World Health Assembly, its health system has been destroyed with no meaningful intervention. The WHO, ECOSOC, and global health institutions face a crisis of credibility if they fail to act.

WFPHA’s Call to Action: Justice, Protection, and Accountability

We demand immediate action, not just advocacy:

1. Immediate Ceasefire and Protection of Civilians 

  • Unconditional, internationally monitored ceasefire

2. Restore Gaza’s Health System 

  • Guaranteed humanitarian corridors
  • Protection for health workers and facilities
  • Independent investigations into violations

3. Legal Accountability for War Crimes 

  • Activate ICC and universal jurisdiction for attacks on health systems

4. Global Health Emergency Declaration 

  • Invest in infrastructure, vaccinations, and data recovery

5. Support Displaced Health Workers 

  • Academic sanctuary, mentorship, and employment aid

6. Permanent Conflict Health Monitoring 

  • WFPHA and WHO must develop real-time monitoring tools

7. Mobilize the Public Health Community 

  • National associations must document violations and speak out

Health Requires Peace as Silence is Complicity

This goes beyond Gaza and Palestine. We demand adherence to public health, human rights, and international law. Neutrality isn’t an option. Never again must mean never again for everyone.

Health demands peace. Public health demands courage.
The time for both is now.

Signed,
World Federation of Public Health Associations (WFPHA)

 

Read the Lancet correspondence letter here

Read the original call to action statement here

Read the original call to action statement in Arabic

Read the original call to action statement in Spanish

Promoting Youth Mental Health

Promoting Youth Mental Health

man beside white frame window

The Global Youth Mental Health Crisis: Causes, Solutions & Urgent Actions Needed

News

Sep 4, 2025

Mental health is key to overall well-being. For young people aged 10 to 24, it’s even more critical. However, today, we face an unprecedented mental health crisis; the aftershocks of COVID-19. The rates of depression, anxiety, and suicide among young people worldwide are rising at an alarming rate. 

Let us explore the causes, consequences, and solutions to this growing issue.  

The Rising Youth Mental Health Crisis: Key Statistics  

While youth mental health crises have always been of concern, the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated them. Some key statistics to consider include:

Nevertheless, where does this all stem from?

Key Risk Factors for Poor Youth Mental Health 

The contributing factors to youth mental health are vast. They include (but are not limited to):

  • Social Media & Digital Stress: While somewhat beneficial, excessive social media use is linked to anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation. 
  • Trauma and Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs): Abuse, neglect, bullying, and family violence increase mental health risks. Economic and Social Inequities: Poverty, job insecurity, and housing instability exacerbate mental well-being issues. 
  • Climate Anxiety: 59% of young people report extreme worry about climate change. 
  • Lack of Access to Care: Only 6% of youth in low-income countries receive mental health treatment.  

While these statistics and trends are worrisome, remember that there’s always hope. Consider the following solutions and strategies to address this crisis and improve the mental health of our youth. 

Solutions: How to Improve Youth Mental Health  

Each and every one of us, whether as individuals, communities, or as a society as a whole, has a role to play in helping combat the youth mental health crisis. 

  •       Government and Policy Actions Needed 

Governments must prioritize prevention over intervention, especially in the context of suicide, by implementing national youth mental health strategies. They can increase funding for mental health services by expanding affordable and accessible care in schools, communities, and most importantly, online. By addressing social determinants such as poverty and discrimination, policies can make a needed difference.

  • Schools and Communities Must Step Up

Teachers can teach coping skills, emotional resilience, and early warning signs. This includes anti-bullying and inclusion programs, especially to protect marginalized groups such as LGBTQAI+, refugees, and Indigenous youth. Providing safe spaces, such as peer support and counseling, can also help combat stigma for youth seeking help. 

  •  Technology and Innovation in Mental Health Care

Teletherapy and mental health apps expand digital mental health services by providing remote access. AI and chatbots can also offer 24/7 crisis intervention and counseling. 

  •  Youth Involvement and Advocacy

Let’s engage young people in designing mental health programs and support initiatives like UNICEF’s Global Coalition for Youth Mental Health. 

Early intervention, increasing access to care, promoting resilience, and addressing social determinants can support the young generation to overcome this crisis. 

Call to Action: What You Can Do

There are several ways you can combat the youth mental health crisis:

  • Advocate for better mental health policies in your community.  
  • Support youth mental health nonprofits and helplines.  
  • Educate yourself and others on early warning signs of mental distress.  
  • Demand universal mental health coverage in healthcare systems.  

By addressing risk factors, expanding access to care, and empowering young voices, we can create a healthier future for the next generation.

Read the official Call to Action: Promoting the Mental Health of Young People Policy Statement here.

Breastfeeding crisis

Breastfeeding crisis

a woman holding a baby under a blanket

The Global Breastfeeding Crisis How Formula Marketing Undermines Infant Health & What We Must Do

News

Oct 2, 2025

Breastfeeding is one of the most effective ways to ensure child survival and long-term health, yet aggressive commercial milk formula (CMF) marketing continues to undermine it. Despite 40 years of international regulations, only 48% of infants worldwide are breastfed as recommended.  

Let’s delve further into how companies exploit parents and healthcare systems, and how governments and healthcare professionals can combat unethical practices. 

The Formula Industry’s Grip on Global Infant Nutrition  

While breastfeeding is biologically natural, billion-dollar corporations have made formula feeding seem “normal.” Yet, the science is clear: breastfeeding prevents disease and boosts development. Especially when considering how unsafe water can make formula feeding deadly.

  1. How Formula Marketing Undermines Breastfeeding Rates  
  •  CMF sales grow yearly, with companies targeting social media, doctors, and hospitals to push products.  
  •  Only 33 out of 194 countries fully enforce the International Code of Breast-milk Substitutes.  
  • False health claims and free samples discourage breastfeeding, especially in vulnerable communities.  
  1. Why Breastfeeding Matters: Lifesaving Benefits  
  • Reduces infant mortality by protecting against diarrhea, pneumonia, and malnutrition.
  • Lowers chronic disease risks (obesity, diabetes) later in life.  
  • Supports brain development, leading to higher IQ scores.  
  • Saves families money: Formula feeding can cost over $ 1,500 per year.  
  1. Formula’s Hidden Dangers in Low-Income Countries  
  • Diluted formula (due to cost) leads to malnutrition.  
  • Contaminated water increases infectious disease risks.  
  • Supply chain disruptions (e.g., wars, disasters) leave babies without food.  

Urgent Actions to Protect Breastfeeding Worldwide 

There are various actions we can take to protect breastfeeding. From fighting corporate manipulation and interests to providing women with more support, we can counter the influence of Big Formula. 

Let’s explore these points further:

1. Ban Predatory Formula Marketing

  •  Enforce the WHO Code, which bans CMF ads, free samples, and health claims.  
  •  Regulate digital marketing, which now targets mothers on Instagram and TikTok.  
  • Penalize violations with fines and legal action.  
  1. Support Mothers with Paid Leave and Workplace Policies  
  • Mandate 6+ months of paid maternity leave (only 25% of countries do this).  
  • Require breastfeeding breaks and private spaces at work.  
  • Educate employers on the economic benefits of breastfeeding.  
  1. End Formula Industry Influence in Healthcare  
  •  Ban CMF company sponsorships of medical conferences and research.  
  • Train health workers on breastfeeding counseling.  
  • Remove formula samples from hospitals and clinics.  
  1. Fund Grassroots Breastfeeding Advocacy  
  • Support mom groups and lactation consultants in underserved areas.  
  • Counter misinformation with social media campaigns.  
  • Partner with midwives and community leaders to promote breastfeeding.  
  1. Prepare for Emergencies with Breastfeeding Support  
  • Prioritize breastfeeding in disaster responses (no formula donations).  
  • Train emergency workers in safe infant feeding practices.  
  • Stockpile breast pumps and lactation aids for displaced mothers.  

A Future Where Every Child Gets the Best Start 

Breastfeeding is a human right, not a corporate profit opportunity. So, what can you do?  

  • Demand stronger formula marketing laws in your country.  
  • Support breastfeeding moms in your community.  
  • Choose ethically sourced breast milk banks over formula when needed.  
  • Share this information: Many parents are unaware of the risks associated with CMF.  

By stopping predatory marketing, supporting mothers, and enforcing global policies, we can ensure that every baby receives the safest and healthiest food, breast milk.

Read the official Policy Resolution on Breastfeeding here. 

Climate change and maternal child health

Climate change and maternal child health

person holding there is no planet b poster

Climate Change and Maternal, Newborn, Child & Adolescent Health: A Global Call to Action

News

Aug 28, 2025

Climate change is here and it’s actively harming the health of women, newborns, children, and adolescents (MNCAH) worldwide. Rising temperatures, extreme weather, and environmental degradation are increasing the risks of pregnancy complications, malnutrition, infectious diseases, and mental health disorders among vulnerable populations.  

According to a 2024 systematic review, climate hazards like extreme heat and air pollution raise the risk of preterm birth, stillbirth, and gestational diabetes by 12-47%. Meanwhile, UNICEF’s 2022 report highlights how floods, droughts, and displacement disrupt access to clean water, healthcare, and nutrition, threatening survival and development.  

Let’s further discuss how climate change exacerbates MNCAH outcomes and explore evidence-based solutions that can protect future generations.  

How Climate Change Harms Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health  

Climate change doesn’t just affect the environment; it directly endangers mothers and babies, threatens food security, and inhibits physical as well as mental health. 

  1. Increased Pregnancy and Birth Complications 

– Extreme heat is linked to preterm birth, low birth weight, and stillbirth.  

– Air pollution from wildfires increases the risks of asthma, respiratory diseases, and developmental delays in children.  

– Flooding and droughts disrupt access to prenatal care, clean water, and nutrition, worsening maternal and infant mortality.  

  1. Rising Infectious Diseases and Malnutrition  

– Vector-borne diseases (malaria, dengue) are spreading to new regions due to warmer temperatures.  

– Water scarcity and contaminated supplies increase diarrheal diseases, a leading cause of child deaths.  

– Crop failures from droughts contribute to child malnutrition and stunted growth, with lifelong consequences.  

  1. Mental Health Crisis in Children and Adolescents

– Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is rising among children exposed to floods, hurricanes, and wildfires.  

Climate anxiety affects 59% of youth globally, with many fearing an unlivable future.  

– Family displacement due to climate disasters disrupts caregiving stability, worsening mental health outcomes.  

Who Is Most Vulnerable? 

Climate change affects everyone. Yet, some groups face disproportionate risks, and the first step is raising awareness about this.   

  • Pregnant women and newborns have a higher susceptibility to heat stress and infections.
  • Children under 5 are vulnerable to malnutrition, disease, and developmental delays.
  • Low-income and marginalized communities lack access to healthcare and disaster resilience.  
  • Climate migrants and refugees face disrupted healthcare and increased poverty.  

Without intervention, the WHO and UNICEF warn that climate-related child deaths could rise by 200,000 every year by 2030.  As Debra Jackson, Professor of Global Maternal and Child Health, LSHTM, and member of the WFPHA Women, Children and Youth Working Group states, “We know women and children are particularly vulnerable to the effects of climate change. Their future and lives depend on immediate action.”

Solutions: Protecting MNCAH in a Changing Climate  

Global climate responses must prioritize maternal and child health, and using better data can help.

  1. Integrate MNCAH into Climate Policies  

– National climate adaptation plans should include MNCAH protections, such as heat-resilient prenatal care.  

– Reduce carbon emissions in healthcare (responsible for 4.4% of global greenhouse gases).  

– Fund climate-resilient hospitals with backup power, clean water, and emergency obstetric care.  

  1. Strengthen Data and Research  

– Track climate-linked health outcomes with real-time monitoring systems.  

– Expand research in low-income countries, where data gaps are largest.  

– Educate communities and health workers on climate-related health risks.  

  1. Multi-Sector Collaboration 

– Health and environmental policies must align (e.g., clean energy reduces air pollution).  

– Private sector investment in sustainable infrastructure and child health programs.  

– Grassroots advocacy to amplify the voices of women, youth, and Indigenous communities.  

We need unity across all sectors to combat this crisis. After all, there’s power in numbers. 

Call to Action: What Must Be Done Now  

The intersection of climate change and maternal-child health is one of the most significant public health challenges of our time. We must act now and demand climate justice for women and children.

  • Governments: Pass laws protecting MNCAH in climate policies.  
  • Healthcare Systems: Build low-carbon, disaster-ready clinics.  
  • Researchers: Fill gaps in climate-health data, especially in vulnerable regions.  
  • Communities: Advocate for local climate adaptation and health equity.  

By implementing evidence-based policies, resilient health systems, and global cooperation, we can safeguard the next generation.  

Read the official Policy Statement and Call to Action on Climate Change and Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health here.