Advancing Children and Young People’s Health and Rights

The Urgent Need for Advocacy in Children’s Health and Rights  

Governments primarily safeguard children’s rights, well-being, and safety. This includes supporting families and communities to address the social determinants of health—factors like poverty, education, and access to healthcare that significantly impact a child’s life trajectory. Despite this, a startling study by Robards, Myers, and Klein Walker (2024) revealed that only eight out of 130 Public Health Associations (PHAs) globally and one Regional PHA have policies specifically addressing women, children, and youth. This gap highlights the urgent need for advocacy and policy development to ensure equitable access to healthcare and integrated support systems.  

Article 24 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child underscores every child’s right to the highest attainable standard of health. However, the World Health Organization reports that injuries, interpersonal violence, self-harm, and maternal conditions remain the leading causes of death among youth. These statistics underscore the critical need for targeted interventions and policies to protect and promote children’s and young people’s health.  

The WFPHA’s Policy Framework: A Roadmap for Change  

The WFPHA’s Children and Young People’s Health and Rights Policy was developed by a dedicated working group comprising over 50 representatives from Public Health Associations worldwide. This policy emphasizes the importance of integrated care and comprehensive support from birth to 18 years, ensuring optimal health and well-being.

Key recommendations include:  

1. Equitable Access to Healthcare: Ensuring all children, regardless of background, have access to essential health services.
   
2. Rights-Based Approaches: Engaging marginalized groups and recognizing children as active participants in decisions affecting their lives.
   
3. Preventive Health Measures: Strengthening primary healthcare and promoting vaccination and early intervention strategies.
4. Mental Health and Trauma Support: Investing in mental health services and trauma-informed care for young people.
   
   
5. Cultural Respect for Indigenous Children: Addressing inequities by prioritizing self-determination and cultural respect.  

The Role of Public Health Associations in Driving Change  

Public Health Associations (PHAs) play a pivotal role in advancing the health of women, children, and youth. However, the research by Robards et al. (2024) found that only 10 out of 130 PHAs globally have dedicated workgroups focusing on these groups. This lack of focus undermines efforts to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly those related to health equity and gender equality.  

The WFPHA’s policy serves as a valuable tool for advocacy, urging governments and PHAs to prioritize children’s health and rights. By adopting and implementing this policy, countries can reduce inequalities and create a healthier, more equitable future for all.  

Key Recommendations for Governments and PHAs

1. Develop and Implement Policies: PHAs should create policy statements that advance the health and rights of women, children, and youth. 
2. Invest in Early Intervention: Governments must allocate resources to early intervention and prevention strategies, particularly for mental health and trauma. 
3. Promote Community Education: Educate communities about preventive health measures like vaccination and healthy lifestyles. 
4. Strengthen Integrated Care: Ensure child protection, family support, and welfare services are adequately resourced and integrated. 
5. Advocate for Equity: Address systemic inequities faced by marginalized groups, including Indigenous children and young people.  

A Collective Responsibility

The health and rights of children and young people are not just a moral imperative but a foundation for sustainable development. The WFPHA’s Children and Young People’s Health and Rights Policy provides a comprehensive framework for action, but its success depends on collective efforts. Governments, PHAs, and communities must work together to ensure every child has the opportunity to thrive. 

Women, Children, and Youth Health Working Group Co-Chairs Interview: Fiona Robards and Deborah Walker

The Working Group of Women, Children, and Youth Health is integral to the World Federation of Public Health Associations (WFPHA). The group is dedicated to advancing public health efforts that support the well-being of women, children, and young people globally. They focus on advocacy, research, and policy development, emphasizing vulnerable populations. 

We had the pleasure of speaking with the Working Group’s co-chairs, Dr. Fiona Robards and Deborah Walker, to learn more about their motivations, current activities, and vision for the future.

Please introduce yourselves.

Fiona Robards: I’m Dr. Fiona Robards, co-chair of the World Federation of Public Health Associations Women, Children, and Youth Health Working Group, and I’m an academic at the University of Sydney in Australia.

Deborah Walker: I’m Deborah Klein Walker, co-chair of the World Federation Women, Children, and Youth Health Working Group. I’m an adjunct professor at Tufts University and the Boston School of Public Health in Boston. I’m also the designated liaison between the American Public Health Association and the World Federation.

What motivated you to pursue a career in the public health sector?

Fiona Robards: I’ve always been interested in the big picture. I started as a psychologist, managed health services for homeless young people, and then moved into policy and academia. I’m interested in preventing health issues and achieving health equity, especially for women, children, and youth. We know that women, children, and young people continue to die at high rates from preventable causes, and child well-being and survival are directly related to the health of mothers. Young people are another neglected population, most living in lower- and middle-income countries.

Deborah Walker: It’s interesting because my reasons for joining public health are similar to Fiona’s. I was trained as a psychologist and discovered public health, which I define as the practice of social justice, improving the health of populations every day. Our working group advocates for interventions to improve the health of women, children, and young people. Universal health care, equity, and health as basic human rights are critical issues for these groups. I have worked in the public health field with a focus on maternal and child health for over 40 years, in academia, public health practice at local, state, and federal levels in the United States, and as a researcher and vice president at a global consulting firm.

Tell me how long you’ve been associated with the World Federation of Public Health Associations.

Fiona Robards: I joined the Women, Children, and Youth Working Group in 2022 and became its co-chair last year, in 2023.

Deborah Walker: I’ve been associated with the World Federation of Public Health since I was the President of the American Public Health Association. I joined actively in 2010. I was a member of the Governing Council at one point, the Advisory Committee, and the Policy Committee since I joined in 2010. I became the chair of the Women, Children, and Youth Working Group in July 2020.

Could you elaborate on your working group’s current activities and share your vision and plans for the future?

Fiona Robards: Our working group has four goals: to advocate for equity in global policies to improve the health of women, children, and youth; to advance public health practice, education, training, and research related to these groups; to expand and strengthen partnerships; and to promote and support the advancement of women, children, and youth health in strong member associations. We’re currently focusing on policy development. We recently developed a new policy on children and young people’s health and rights, and we’re working on a range of new policies, including one on youth mental health, a call to action on climate action for maternal, newborn, and child health populations, breastfeeding, preconception and fertility, and youth health.

Deborah Walker: We, for example, have difficulty finding a time for our meetings that will incorporate all the time zones of the world, especially since Fiona and I are in two opposite extremes of the globe, Australia and the United States. We’ve settled on a time that seems to work for us and all the other time zones. Another challenge is finding resources so we can meet in person. We are especially looking for funds to send a core group of us to the next World Congress in South Africa.

How do the working group’s activities align with and support implementing the WFPHA strategic plan?

Deborah Walker: The mission of the World Federation of Public Health Associations is to protect people and the planet, prevent diseases, and promote peace, health, and well-being. The Women, Children, and Youth Working Group focuses on addressing health inequity for these populations, emphasizing the most vulnerable groups and providing a forum for developing resolutions for actions for the World Federation and its member public health associations. The World Federation’s goals that we align with and support include advocating for peace, sustainable health equity, and global policies; contributing to systems change; strengthening and democratizing global health governance; advancing public health knowledge, education, practice, and research; growing new and maintaining existing partnerships; supporting and enhancing member organizations; and building an effective, efficient, responsive, and sustainable World Federation of Public Health Associations.

Please tell me in what ways being part of the WFPHA and its network has enhanced the activities of your working group.

Fiona Robards: We collaborate with two working groups, the Tobacco Working Group and the Oral Health Working Group, on research projects. One project explores young people’s views of the tobacco endgame, and another explores international and national frameworks, guidelines, recommendations, and strategies for maternal tobacco prevention and cessation. We’re also developing a youth mental health policy and will seek feedback from the Mental Health Working Group.

How does being part of the WFPHA strengthen your group’s advocacy for the health issues of women, children, and youth?

Deborah Walker: The World Federation of Public Health Associations provides a global platform for advocacy to promote the health of women, children, and youth. We have used this platform to reach out to public and regional public health associations to build our membership. Recently, 32 new members joined from a wide range of countries on all continents. The new members have expressed interest in working on our various policies under development, which is fabulous to see.

What strategies does the group use to form effective partnerships for advancing health outcomes for women, children, and youth?

Fiona Robards: If we’re to end preventable maternal, child, and youth deaths and improve the quality of life for all the world’s people, then, of course, the voices from these population groups must be heard and engaged. We learn from our colleagues around the globe about culturally appropriate and effective interventions.

What benefits has your group gained from WFPHA’s global partnerships and collaborative opportunities?

Deborah Walker: The World Federation of Public Health Associations’ collaborative opportunities have enabled us to develop research partnerships and policies and grow our membership. Frankly, we are beginning to see the impact of the World Federation’s partnerships on our work.

Do you have any accomplishments right now that you’re proud of?

Deborah Walker: We were fortunate to have an intern from the World Federation who developed a study on all maternal and child health policies from the different member associations. Fiona took the lead on the article to be published in the Journal of Public Health Policy. We found very few policies on women, children, and youth in those public health associations. That is why we are focused on developing policies for the World Federation that member public health associations can adopt. When this population is almost half of the world, and if women and children do well, we all do.

Conclusion

The WFPHA Working Group on Women, Children, and Youth Health is dedicated to improving global health outcomes for these vulnerable populations through advocacy, policy development, and partnerships. Under the leadership of co-chairs Fiona Robards and Deborah Walker, the group continues to drive forward initiatives that emphasize equity, health rights, and culturally relevant interventions. Their work is essential in shaping a healthier future for women, children, and youth worldwide, ensuring their voices are heard and needs addressed globally.

Working Group members:

Adebayo Amao, Professor and Consultant Community Physician Adesola Olumide, University of Ibadan Nigeria

Alix Woldring, Centre for Population Health, NSW Ministry of Health, PHA of Australia
Dr. Amie Steel, University of Technology Sydney, PHA of Australia

Anastesia Araba Tawiah, WFPHA Intern, PHA of Australia

Ayokunle Kajero, Society for Adolescents and Young People’s Health in Nigeria (SAYPHIN), Nigeria

Dr. Claire Copperstone, Malta Association of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta

Danielle Schoenaker, UK

Deborah Klein Walker, EdD,  Boston University, American PHA, USA

Professor Debra Jackson, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK
Evelyn Cherow, MA, MPA, American PHA, USA

Professor Fatema Ashraf, Public Health Foundation of Bangladesh

Dr. Fiona Robards, University of Sydney, PHA of Australia

Dr. Funmilayo Morebise, Society for Adolescent and Youth Health in Nigeria (SAYPHIN, Nigeria

Haley Myers, MPH, American PHA, USA

Dr. Hyewon Lee, Korea

Jasmine Lykissas, Communications at the PHA of Australia

Justine Salisbury, Centre for Population Health, NSW Ministry of Health, PHA of Australia

Professor Mitike Molla Sisay, Ethiopian PHA, Ethiopia

Nabankema Victoria, MPH, Uganda National Association of Community Occupational Health, Uganda

Narila Mutia, Assistant Professor, Indonesia Public Health Association/ IAKMI, Indonesia

Olaniyan Halimat, Society for Adolescent and Youth Health in Nigeria (SAYPHIN), Nigeria

Dr. Oliver-Williams, Clare, Global Violence Prevention SIG Co-Chair, UK

Dr. Olujide Arije, Institute of Public Health, Obafemi Awolowo University, Nigeria

Onyinye Gloria, Society for Adolescent and Youth Health in Nigeria (SAYPHIN), Nigeria

Owolabi Tomiwa, PhD candidate, Institute of Child Health, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria

Rachel Barbabela, MPH, Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist, Portugal

Dr. Tope.O. Durojaiye, Society for Public Health Professionals in Nigeria (SPHPN), Society for Adolescent and Young People’s Health in Nigeria (SAYPHIN), Nigeria

Vina Hulamm, USA

Yemisrach Shiferaw, Ethiopian PHA, Ethiopia

The US Withdrawal from WHO: A Threat to Global Health

The decision by the US government to sever ties with the World Health Organization (WHO) has far-reaching consequences for public health in the US and globally. The US withdrawal from WHO jeopardizes critical health initiatives, weakens international cooperation and undermines efforts to address pressing global challenges. With the US historically being the largest contributor to the WHO, providing 15% of its budget, this move leaves a significant funding gap that affects programs worldwide.

The Real-World Impact of the US Withdrawal from WHO

The ripple effects of the US withdrawal from WHO are already being felt. For example, NGOs providing life-saving HIV medication in several African countries are now forced to ration supplies due to funding shortages. In sub-Saharan Africa, where 67% of people living with HIV reside, this could reverse decades of progress in combating the epidemic.

Additionally, the US stepping back from the International Negotiating Body (INB) undermines global efforts to address health crises through coordinated action. The INB plays a critical role in pandemic preparedness and response, and without US support, its ability to function effectively is compromised.

The Broader Implications for Multilateralism

The US withdrawal from WHO is not just about funding—it’s an attack on multilateralism. The multilateral system has historically played a crucial role in preventing conflicts, mitigating social crises, and supporting vulnerable populations. For instance, the WHO’s eradication of smallpox in 1980 and its ongoing efforts to combat polio are testaments to the power of international collaboration.

By stepping away, the US weakens trust among nations and diminishes the influence of international organizations. This move could embolden other countries to follow suit, further fragmenting global efforts to address shared challenges.

The Moral Obligation to Collaborate on Global Health

Health issues transcend national borders. Governments are morally obligated to protect their citizens’ right to health, including collaborating with multilateral institutions like the WHO. The challenges we face today—climate change, economic exploitation, mass displacement, and authoritarianism—are global. Addressing them requires a coordinated international strategy.

For example, climate change is already exacerbating health crises, with the WHO estimating that between 2030 and 2050, climate change will cause approximately 250,000 additional deaths per year from malnutrition, malaria, diarrhea, and heat stress. Without global cooperation, these numbers could rise even further.

A Call to Action: Supporting WHO and Multilateralism

The World Federation of Public Health Associations (WFPHA) urges nations to support the WHO and multilateral organizations. Investing in global health and maintaining international cooperation is not just a choice—it’s a duty.

We also express our solidarity with the people of the United States and remain confident that their democratic institutions will resist the rise of authoritarianism. The US has a long history of leadership in global health, from the founding of the WHO in 1948 to its contributions to eradicating diseases like smallpox. It’s not too late to reverse course and reaffirm this commitment.

The Path Forward

The US withdrawal from WHO is a significant setback for global health, but it’s not irreversible. By reaffirming its commitment to multilateralism and international cooperation, the US can help protect the health and well-being of people worldwide. Global challenges require global solutions, and the WHO remains a vital institution in this effort.

Read the original statement here.

Mpox: Comprehensive Guide and the WFPHA Statement  

Key Strategies for Overcoming Vaccine Hesitancy among Healthcare Workers [Report]

Vaccination is a cornerstone of public health, saving millions of lives annually. Yet, despite their critical role in administering vaccines and promoting public health, healthcare workers (HCWs) are not immune to vaccine hesitancy.

This article explores key strategies to increase vaccination uptake among healthcare providers worldwide, based on a comprehensive report by the World Federation of Public Health Associations (WFPHA).

The Importance of Vaccinating Healthcare Workers

Healthcare workers are essential in shaping public perception and trust in vaccines. Their vaccination status significantly influences whether they recommend immunization to their patients.

Despite this, global trends show an alarming decline in vaccine uptake among HCWs, driven by concerns about vaccine safety, efficacy, and personal susceptibility to disease.

This hesitancy seriously affects the healthcare providers and the vulnerable populations they serve.

Case Studies: Successful Vaccination Campaigns in Healthcare

The WFPHA report draws real-world examples from six WHO regions to highlight successful vaccination campaigns for HCWs. These case studies reveal how tailored strategies can overcome barriers to vaccination:

• Zambia: A hepatitis B vaccination campaign targeting healthcare workers and nursing students, featuring free vaccines, transportation reimbursements, and peer influence.
• Canada: An MMR vaccination initiative for healthcare professionals, utilizing mobile apps for tracking and reminder systems to boost vaccination rates.
• Qatar: An influenza vaccination campaign with strong leadership involvement, peer education, and mandatory declination forms for healthcare workers in high-risk areas.

Key Drivers of Successful Vaccination Campaigns

Several factors are crucial in improving vaccination rates among HCWs:

• Leadership Engagement: Leadership support is vital in promoting a culture of vaccination. Visible participation by senior management encourages vaccination compliance and builds trust within healthcare institutions.
• Peer Influence: HCWs are more likely to get vaccinated when encouraged by their peers, particularly when they witness vaccines’ impact on protecting staff and patients.
• Convenient Access: On-site vaccination clinics, extended hours, and mobile units make it easier for HCWs to get vaccinated, reducing logistical barriers.

Addressing Gaps in Data and Research

A critical finding in the report is the need for comprehensive data on healthcare worker vaccinations, particularly in low-income countries (LICs).

Designing effective vaccination strategies or allocating resources appropriately is difficult without accurate data.

Moreover, HCWs often need to be more represented in policy-making processes, leading to strategies that fail to address their unique challenges and needs.

Recommendations for Improving Healthcare Worker Vaccination

The WFPHA offers a range of recommendations to increase vaccination rates among healthcare workers, categorized into three levels of implementation:

• Entry-Level Strategies: These include cost-effective interventions such as educational materials tailored to specific concerns, peer-to-peer vaccination programs, and small incentives to motivate HCWs to get vaccinated.
• Mid-Level Strategies: These are more resource-intensive measures, such as on-site vaccination clinics, mobile units, and active declination processes in which HCWs who refuse vaccination must provide reasons for their decision.
• Advanced Strategies: Systemic changes include mandatory vaccination policies for HCWs in high-risk areas and data registries to track vaccination status. Advocacy for amending occupational safety laws to include vaccination is also a key recommendation.

Strengthening Occupational Safety Laws

In many LICs, occupational safety laws do not adequately protect healthcare workers through vaccination. The report stresses the need for governments to update these laws to ensure HCWs are protected against preventable diseases, ensuring both safety and sustainability for global health systems.

Conclusion: A Global Approach to Protecting Healthcare Workers

The WFPHA report highlights the importance of collaboration between healthcare providers, policymakers, and public health organizations in creating effective vaccination programs. By addressing individual hesitations and systemic barriers, these strategies aim to protect healthcare workers and their communities, ultimately enhancing global health security.

Read the full report here.

Environmental Health Working Group Co-Chairs Interview: Hannah Marcus, Andrea Rother, and Lwando Maki

We are excited to present an insightful discussion with the WFPHA Environmental Health Working Group co-chairs Hannah Marcus, Professor Andrea Rother, and Dr. Lwando Maki. These distinguished leaders bring a wealth of knowledge and experience in environmental health. Hannah Marcus is renowned for her environmental policy and public health advocacy work, while Andrea Rother is a prominent figure in chemical risk management and children’s environmental health. Lwando Maki brings a dynamic perspective with his sustainable development and community health expertise. 

In this interview, they delve into the critical field of environmental health, exploring how our environment impacts health outcomes and discussing global strategies to address pressing environmental health challenges.

Please introduce yourselves

Hannah Marcus: I’m Hannah Marcus, the co-chair of the WFPHA Environmental Health Working Group. I started as an intern with the group in 2019, then became a member, a young co-chair, and now a co-chair alongside Lwando and Andrea. Previously, I worked alongside Liz Hannah, our former co-chair. I’m based in Nairobi, Kenya, working with an organization focused on research in the humanitarian and development sectors.

Lwando Maki: I’m Lwando Maki from South Africa. I’m a medical doctor and public health medicine specialist. I am completing my second specialty in internal medicine at the University of Cape Town. I co-chair the Environmental Health Working Group with Hannah and Andrea. I have held various leadership roles in national, regional, and global associations/organizations, including the World Medical Association and the Public Health Association of South Africa.

Andrea Rother: I’m Andrea Rother, a professor and head of the Environmental Health Division at the University of Cape Town’s (UCT) School of Public Health. My work focuses on chemicals, pesticides, children’s environmental health, and the nexus between climate change and chemicals. I also work on risk communication and the commercial determinants of health.

What motivated you to pursue a career in the public health sector?

Hannah Marcus: Initially, I was interested exclusively in the biomedical aspects of health, but upon engaging further with material from diverse disciplines such as anthropology, sociology, political science, environmental studies, and international development, I quickly realized how much more multifaceted health is, and this stimulated a deeper passion for the broader social determinants of health and environmental factors affecting health outcomes. My internship with the WFPHA in 2019, working at the intersection of climate change and health, solidified my interest in public health and its environmental aspects.

Lwando Maki: My motivation stems from a genuine desire to help others and the recognition of public health’s role in preventing diseases at the population level. Events in South Africa, such as extreme weather and its impact on health systems, propelled me to focus on climate change and public health. Growing up in a community that faced significant environmental challenges, I saw firsthand how environmental degradation and climate change disproportionately affect vulnerable populations. This inspired me to pursue a career where I could address these inequities. I focus on integrating local knowledge and grassroots involvement into environmental health initiatives, ensuring that solutions are inclusive and equitable. Representing African voices in global health forums is also a significant driving force for me.

Andrea Rother: My research journey began with a focus on women in agriculture and protecting traditional farming practices, which led to an interest in pesticides’ negative impacts and their regulation in Africa. My master’s research focused on the effectiveness of pesticide regulations in Zimbabwe in protecting human health. Subsequently, my PhD focused on the impact of risk perceptions and risk communication on South African (SA) farm workers’ health. In 1996 I joined the UCT Department of Community Health to implement a pesticide policy reform project in all nine SA provinces. Joining a public health department set me on the path of integrating environmental health concerns into teaching, research, outreach, and national/international policy work – i.e., chemicals, pesticides, climate change, commercial determinants of health, and children’s environmental health. This culminated in me setting up a Division of Environmental Health at UCT, developing three academic programs (two online for pesticide and chemical regulators), and representing UCT and WFPHA in international chemical negotiations (e.g., developing a science policy panel on chemicals and waste). I work tirelessly to support the African region in these negotiations to ensure that protecting vulnerable populations’ health is at the forefront.

How long have you been associated with The World Federation of Public Health Associations?

Hannah Marcus: I started with the WFPHA as an intern in 2019. During that time, I led a global survey on governance barriers to climate adaptation in the health sector, the results of which have been published in the International Journal of Health Governance. From there, I gradually took on more responsibilities, eventually becoming a young co-chair in 2021 and now a co-chair.

Lwando Maki: I’ve been involved with the Public Health Association of South Africa, a member of the WFPHA, since around 2014/2015. My leadership involvement at the WFPHA in 2022 led to my current leadership role.

Andrea Rother: In 2005, I became the South African National Focal Point Representative for the Human Health Effects of Chemicals Project of the World Federation of Public Health Association (WFPHA), representing the Public Health Association of South Africa (PHASA). I officially joined the WFPHA Environmental Health Working Group in 2018. Early on, I began reporting on international work and negotiations linked to chemicals and health. I then transitioned into the honored shared leadership role with Hannah and Lwando.

Please elaborate on your working group’s current activities and share your vision and plans for the future.

Hannah Marcus: Our focus areas include climate change, chemical regulation, air pollution, One Health, and Just Transition. We contribute to the WHO civil society working group on climate change and health, where we’ve been involved in co-drafting and leading advocacy in favor of a new climate change and health resolution adopted in May 2024 by the World Health Assembly. We are now also involved in a WHO-led task force to support preparing a climate health education-oriented work program for COP29 and COP30. We also host interns for small-scale research projects and policy reviews. Our objectives include expanding membership, updating policies, and fundraising. Our vision is to convene public health experts, collaborate on issues, and influence global policy.

Lwando Maki: We support and advise our member associations, ensuring they are informed and capable of implementing climate-related policies. Our activities are aligned with the WFPHA’s strategic plan, contributing to mainstreaming environmental considerations into public health policies. I’d like to add that environmental health is deeply tied to social justice. Marginalized communities often bear the brunt of environmental hazards. For instance, communities in many parts of Africa face severe water scarcity and pollution, exacerbating health issues and poverty. Addressing environmental health means addressing these inequalities and ensuring everyone can access a healthy environment.

Andrea Rother: We represent the issues of our working group in international negotiations (e.g., chemical, climate change, plastics) and keep our members informed of current activities and negotiations. This allows members to contribute their insights into these discussions during our regular meetings and to incorporate current negotiated outputs also shared during these meetings into their own research, teaching, and outreach work.

How do the working group’s activities align with and support implementing our association’s strategic plan?

Hannah Marcus: Environmental health is a key tenet of the WFPHA strategic plan. Our work ensures that environmental considerations are integrated into public health policies. Climate change is a central focus, and we contribute significantly.

Lwando Maki: The strategic plan is developed with input from working groups like ours. We collaborate with other working groups and ensure our actions align with the strategic plan through regular reporting and feedback.

How has being part of the WFPHA and its network enhanced the activities of your working group and expanded its reach?

Lwando Maki: The WFPHA’s reputation and leadership attract experts to our working group. It provides access to global forums like the World Health Assembly and COP meetings. Collaboration with other sectors and network access amplify our work and enhance our activities.

Andrea Rother: Representing WFPHA in international chemical negotiations gives credibility to our environmental health-focused interventions during these negotiations. It has also supported our efforts to make health issues more prominent in environment-dominated negotiations (i.e., the health sector is extremely underrepresented, and few health ministries attend). 

How has WFPHA membership strengthened your group’s influence on international environmental health policies?

Andrea Rother: We’ve been active in sectors like chemicals, climate change, air pollution, and migrant health. Our involvement includes attending international meetings, signing letters, and drafting policy resolutions. For example, we helped draft a resolution on climate change and health adopted by the World Health Assembly.

Can you describe a collaborative project with the environmental advocacy community that had a significant impact?

Hannah Marcus: We collaborated with an institution in the Netherlands to develop a toolkit for public health professionals to support climate change litigation. Our member associations provided input through a survey, contributing to the toolkit’s development and dissemination.

How does the support from the WFPHA facilitate your group’s integration of public health approaches into environmental advocacy?

Hannah Marcus: The WFPHA provides a platform for integrating diverse public health perspectives into our work and bringing together diverse disciplinary experts in the field. Collaboration with other working groups ensures a comprehensive approach to environmental health issues.

Andrea Rother: The WFPHA offers access to global forums like the World Health Assembly, where environmental health issues can be highlighted and integrated into broader public health discussions.

Any last words?

Hannah Marcus: I want to reiterate the importance of collaboration and the collective effort to shape global policy on environmental health issues. The WFPHA’s support is crucial in bringing diverse voices and expertise together to achieve our goals.

Working Group Members:

– Hannah Marcus, Co-Chair, Consilient Research, Somaliland.

– Andrea Rother, Co-Chair, Division of Environmental Health, School of Public Health University of Cape Town, South Africa.

– Lwando Maki, Co-Chair, World Medical Association, South African Medical Association, Public Health Association of South Africa, World Health Assembly, South Africa.

– Liz Hanna, Chair (alumni), Australia National University, Australia.

– Peter Orris, Co-Chair (alumni), University of Illinois, World Medical Association, USA.

– Peter Tait, Member, Australia National University, Public Health Association of Australia, Australia.

– Chadia Wannous, Member, World Organisation for Animal Health, France.

– Ramon San Pascual, Member, Health Care without Harm, Philippines.

– Eliana Martinez Herrera, Grupo de Investigación Epidemiologia GEPI Universidad de Antioquia; Grupo de Investigación en Desigualdades en la Salud, Ecología y Condiciones de Empleo y Trabajo GREDS/EMCONET; Public Policy Center JHU-UPF. Asociación Colombiana de Salud Pública; Asociacion Colombiana de Epidemiología, Colombia.

– Joyce Shirinde, Member, University of Pretoria School of Health Systems and Public Health, South Africa.

– Shweta Narayan, Member, Health Care Without Harm.

– Jit Sohal, Member, Health Care Without Harm, Philippines.

– Guilherme Netto, Member, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Brazil.

– Mirwais Amiri, Member, Eastern Mediterranean Public Health Network, Jordan.

– Sayed Himatt, Member, Eastern Mediterranean Public Health Network, Jordan.

– Mohannad Jaghabir, Member, Eastern Mediterranean Public Health Network, Jordan.

– Haitham Bashier, Member, Eastern Mediterranean Public Health Network, Sudan.

– Deema Al Bakri, Member, Eastern Mediterranean Public Health Network, Jordan.

– Lea Merone, Member, University of Queensland, Australia.

– Annalaura Carducci, Member, University of Pisa, Italy.

– Susan Elliott, Member, University of Waterloo, Canada.

– Tara Chen, Member, University of Waterloo, Canada.

– Katherine Catalano, Member, Deputy Director, Center for Climate, Health and Equity, American Public Health Association.

– Sari Kovats, Member, Associate Professor in the Department of Public Health, Environments and Society at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.

– Caradee Wright, Member, Chief Specialist Scientist: Environment and Health Research Unit, South Africa.

– David Patterson, Member, International Development Law Organization (IDLO), EUPHA-LAW, the Netherlands.

– Kris Ebi, Member, University of Washington Center for Health and the Global Environment, USA.