Integrating China in the International Consortium for Personalized Medicine Project: A Glance

Integrating China in the International Consortium for Personalized Medicine Project: A Glance

Integrating China in the International Consortium for Personalized Medicine Project: A Glance

News

Mar 10, 2023

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, and its prevalence continues to rise. Traditional cancer treatments such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy can have significant side effects, and they may not be effective for all patients. The field of personalized medicine has the potential to revolutionize cancer prevention and treatment by tailoring therapies to an individual patient’s specific genetic and molecular profile.

Despite the potential benefits of personalized medicine for cancer, there are still significant challenges to its widespread implementation. One of these challenges is the lack of alignment between policies in different regions of the world. To address this issue, the Integrating China in the International Consortium for Personalized Medicine (IC2PerMed) consortium, of which the World Federation of Public Health Associations (WFPHA) is a partner, has developed a common roadmap for personalized medicine for cancer to foster common approaches between the People’s Republic of China and the European Union (EU) on personalized medicine research, development, innovation, and policies.

The IC2PerMed consortium is an EU initiative that aims to promote the implementation of personalized medicine in prevention and care. The consortium brings together organizations, researchers, policymakers, and healthcare professionals to work towards a common goal of improving patients’ outcomes.

The IC2PerMed consortium’s roadmap for personalized medicine for cancer has been finalized and is being presented at a series of events, including WFPHA webinars, a dedicated workshop at the 17th World Congress on Public Health, and a high-level symposium held in Geneva, Switzerland, in conjunction with the World Health Assembly.

The high-level symposium brings together high-level policymakers, scientists, and Chief Executive Officers from international health-related organizations to discuss the importance of personalized medicine for cancer and beyond and the need for international collaboration to promote its implementation. The meeting also provides an opportunity to showcase the work of the IC2PerMed consortium.

Improving Childhood Vaccination Coverage Rates in Europe

Improving Childhood Vaccination Coverage Rates in Europe

Improving Childhood Vaccination Coverage Rates in Europe

News

Feb 10, 2023

Childhood vaccination contributes to reducing mortality and morbidity globally, reducing disease incidence, and providing health protection. In short, it is a key driver in disease prevention.

In recent decades, childhood vaccination coverage has risen across Europe, with several countries managing to achieve the 95% coverage goal within the last ten years. This should be worthy of applause. However, coverage rates in many areas within the European Union (EU) declined in the period between 2010 and 2021. As a result, several European countries have experienced unprecedented outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs), including measles outbreaks. This general trend requires increased efforts to combat barriers around vaccination uptake, as robust and resilient vaccination systems across the EU are crucial to protecting the population from preventable illnesses and deaths due to VPDs, as well as ensuring recovery from any future crises.

In an article published by the researchers of the WFPHA and its International Immunization Policy Taskforce, they assessed the state of the changes in vaccination coverage in the EU between 2010 and 2021 based on the World Health Organization (WHO) vaccination indicators of Diphtheria, Tetanus, and Pertussis (DTP) 1st dose, DTP 3rd dose, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib3), Hepatitis B 3rd dose (HepB3), measles 1st dose, measles 2nd dose, and polio 3rd dose. They summarized key learnings and trends in childhood vaccination within the EU, with a focus on current challenges and enablers.

Childhood Vaccination Coverage Rates in the EU between 2010 & 2021

According to the article:

  • For all vaccines assessed, a high degree of variation and fluctuation in coverage rates in the EU between 2010 and 2021 can be observed.
  • There is a general pattern of declining coverage across vaccines in 2019 compared to 2010.
  • Lower-performing countries, such as Austria or Romania, show more frequent or more severe fluctuations across vaccines.
  • Higher-performing countries tend to have little or no fluctuation in coverage rates.

Variations Show Vulnerability

Variations or fluctuations in vaccination coverage rates are a concern. Vaccine fluctuations indicate the fragility of vaccination coverages and of the immunization ecosystem. Strong efforts are needed to ensure countries have robust and resilient immunization systems.

Factors Causing Fluctuations in Childhood Vaccination Coverage Rates in the EU

The article summarized the following barriers causing fluctuations in vaccination coverage rates in the EU:

  • Structural barriers (e.g., having to take time off work to get a child vaccinated)
  • Delays in vaccine procurement
  • Vaccine hesitancy (among the public and/or health care professionals)
  • Spread of misinformation about vaccination
  • The COVID-19 pandemic
  • The Ukraine crisis

Enablers for Increasing Childhood Vaccination Coverage Rates in the EU

The article summarized the following enablers for increasing vaccination coverage rates in the EU:

  • Easy access to vaccine administration
  • Outreach services and catch-up campaigns
  • Vaccination policies (depending on local context)
  • Real-time systematic data collection
  • Communication between individuals and healthcare workers regarding vaccines
  • Sending vaccine reminders
  • Awareness-raising and education campaigns
  • Easily accessible and reliable information materials about vaccination

Recommendations for Improving Childhood Vaccination Coverage Rates in the EU Based on the WFPHA’s Policy

The article summarized the following recommendations for improving childhood vaccination coverage rates in the EU based on the WFPHA International Immunization Policy Taskforce’s key recommendations to improve the resilience of childhood vaccination programs in the EU for policy makers to take forward at EU and national levels:

Facilitate access to vaccination

  • Increase range of providers to administer vaccination
  • Enable providers to administer vaccinations outside of the site where they are employed (e.g., administer vaccines at childcare facilities)
  • Additional hours to access vaccinations (e.g., outside of regular work hours)

Develop mitigation strategies and plans to respond to VPD outbreak

  • Ensure sufficient infrastructure and health worker capacity

Increase use of digital technologies

  • Improve real-time data collection and disease surveillance systems
  • Electronic immunization records
  • Automated vaccination reminders

Improve education and awareness regarding the value of vaccination

  • Public awareness and communication campaigns
  • Public health education programs

Considering the convergence of the current COVID-19 and Ukraine crises, the article recommended concrete crisis preparedness plans to ensure immunity gaps do not further exacerbate the disruption of vaccination systems.

What Is the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB)?

What Is the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB)?

What Is the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB)?

News

Dec 13, 2022

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed major gaps in global health preparedness, coordination, and response. In response, governments around the world began exploring stronger international cooperation to better prevent and manage future pandemics.

One of the most significant steps in this effort was the creation of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB). This body was established by the World Health Assembly to develop a global agreement to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response.

Understanding the role of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body helps explain how the international community is working to reduce the risks of future global health crises.

Why the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body Was Created

The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on human lives, economies, and societies worldwide. The scale of disruption highlighted the need for stronger international alignment when responding to emerging health threats.

To avoid repeating the challenges experienced during COVID-19, the global community recognized the importance of building more coordinated mechanisms for pandemic preparedness.

As a result, countries agreed that a formal international framework could strengthen cooperation, information sharing, and response strategies during future pandemics.

The Historic World Health Assembly Special Session

In December 2021, the World Health Assembly Special Session (WHASS) took place in Geneva, Switzerland.

This meeting was historic: it was only the second time in the history of the World Health Organization (WHO) that the Health Assembly convened twice in the same year.

During this session, Member States agreed to establish the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB).

The mandate of the INB is to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement, or other international instrument under the Constitution of the World Health Organization. The goal of this instrument is to strengthen global systems for pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response.

The Core Mandate of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body

The Intergovernmental Negotiating Body is responsible for developing a global framework that helps countries work together more effectively during health emergencies.

Its work focuses on creating an international instrument that supports:

  • Stronger pandemic prevention strategies
  • Improved preparedness for emerging health threats
  • More coordinated global response mechanisms
  • Greater cooperation among countries and health systems

The INB’s work is guided by several core principles:

  • Inclusiveness
  • Transparency
  • Efficiency
  • Member State leadership
  • Consensus-based decision making

These principles ensure that negotiations reflect broad international participation and collaboration.

Timeline for the Pandemic Agreement Negotiations

The Intergovernmental Negotiating Body was tasked with progressing negotiations within a clear timeline.

Key milestones include:

  • Progress reporting to the 76th World Health Assembly in 2023
  • Target adoption of the international instrument by 2024

These milestones allow Member States to evaluate progress and ensure that negotiations continue to move forward.

How the INB Process Includes Global Stakeholders

Although the INB is led by Member States, the process also involves participation from a wide range of stakeholders.

The decision establishing the INB requested that the WHO Director-General convene meetings and support the negotiation process. This includes organizing public hearings to gather perspectives from organizations and experts.

Participants in the process may include:

  • United Nations system bodies
  • Non-state actors
  • Civil society organizations
  • Global health stakeholders

This inclusive approach ensures that negotiations consider diverse expertise and perspectives from across the global health community.

Public Health Organizations Contributing to the INB Process

Public health organizations have played an active role in the consultation process surrounding the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body.

During INB public hearings, several organizations submitted statements to contribute to the discussions, including:

  • The World Federation of Public Health Associations (WFPHA)
  • The International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW)
  • The International Hospital Federation (IHF)
  • The World Organization of Family Doctors (WONCA)

These contributions help ensure that public health expertise informs the development of the international pandemic instrument.

Why the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body Matters for Future Pandemics

The creation of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body reflects a global recognition that stronger international cooperation is essential to address future health threats.

By working toward a shared framework for pandemic preparedness and response, the INB aims to help countries:

  • Strengthen health system resilience
  • Improve coordination during emergencies
  • Reduce global health inequalities
  • Respond more rapidly to emerging threats

Ultimately, the work of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body represents an important step toward building a more coordinated and effective global system for pandemic preparedness.

Statement on Protecting Ecosystems & Supporting Nature-based Solutions for Improved Public Health

Statement on Protecting Ecosystems & Supporting Nature-based Solutions for Improved Public Health

Protecting Ecosystems Through Nature-based Solutions for Improved Public Health

News

Nov 11, 2022

The relationship between the natural world and human health is foundational. From the food we eat and the water we drink to the air we breathe and the environments where we live, human survival depends on the health of ecosystems.

This reality underpins the growing global focus on nature-based solutions for improved public health. Protecting biodiversity and restoring ecosystem functions are environmental priorities and public health imperatives.

The World Federation of Public Health Associations (WFPHA) highlighted this urgency in its official statement during the 27th Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP27), calling for a stronger global commitment to ecosystem protection and nature-positive climate strategies.

The Invisible Infrastructure Supporting Human Health

The interconnectedness between natural and human systems is well-documented and observable in the sheer breadth of our interactions with nature. Ecosystems provide food, water, shelter, and virtually every critical resource needed for human survival and prosperity.

The health benefits derived from ecosystems are delivered through biodiversity, species composition, and complex ecological processes performed by natural systems.

These processes enable ecosystems to deliver what are commonly known as ecosystem services, typically grouped into four categories:

  • Provisioning services: such as food, freshwater, and medicinal resources

  • Regulating services: including climate regulation, flood control, and disease regulation

  • Supporting services: such as nutrient cycling and soil formation

  • Cultural services: including recreation, mental wellbeing, and social connection

More recently, these benefits have also been described as nature’s contributions to people, emphasizing how ecosystem health directly influences human well-being.

When Ecosystems Fail, Public Health Suffers

When ecosystems cannot function optimally, the consequences are immediate and far-reaching for human health.

Examples illustrate how ecological degradation directly undermines well-being:

  • Soil microbial depletion reduces the nutritional quality and yield of agricultural crops.

  • Pollinator decline disrupts plant reproduction, threatening food production and medicinal resources.

  • Deforestation destroys habitats needed to maintain biodiversity and ecological balance.

  • Ocean pollution damages marine ecosystems and diminishes cultural, recreational, and psychological benefits associated with coastal environments.

Each of these disruptions weakens the ecological systems that support human life.

Environmental Degradation Is Reversing Public Health Gains

Over the past 70 years, economic and technological growth, often described as the “great acceleration,” has lifted millions from poverty and extended life expectancy worldwide. Yet these gains have come at a profound environmental cost.

Because public health is fundamentally intertwined with ecosystem health, environmental degradation threatens to reverse decades of progress.

Research shows that ecological breakdown can:

  • Reduce the nutrient content and productivity of food systems

  • Harm agriculture-based livelihoods

  • Trigger severe mental health consequences, particularly among Indigenous communities

  • Disrupt planetary systems necessary for climate stability

These intersecting pressures illustrate how environmental damage represents a systemic threat to human survival and well-being.

Biodiversity Loss and the Rising Burden of Disease

Even when examined individually, ecological disruptions can have enormous public health consequences.

For example:

  • Pollinator loss could place 71 million people at risk of vitamin A deficiency and 173 million people at risk of folate deficiency, contributing to 1.42 million additional deaths annually from malnutrition and non-communicable diseases.

  • Urban areas without adequate green space experience higher air pollution, more frequent heat waves, elevated stress levels, and increased rates of non-communicable diseases.

  • Deforestation has been linked to increased waterborne diseases due to reduced flood control and contamination of surface water sources.

  • Tropical forest loss increases interactions between humans and wildlife, raising the risk of emerging infectious diseases that could trigger epidemics or pandemics.

These examples demonstrate how ecosystem health functions as a protective barrier for global public health.

Climate Change Is Intensifying Ecosystem and Health Risks

At COP27, global discussions emphasized the accelerating impacts of climate change on ecosystems and human wellbeing.

The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report highlights that climate change is already affecting:

  • Marine and coastal ecosystems

  • Terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems

  • Global food production systems

These changes are expected to produce cascading public health impacts.

For example:

  • Climate change could increase the number of people at risk of hunger by 8 to 80 million by mid-century, with the highest impacts in Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Central America.

  • Extreme temperature, rainfall variability, droughts, flooding, and sea-level rise will likely increase outbreaks of aquatic pathogens in coastal populations.

  • Shifts in ecosystem conditions and vector ranges are expected to significantly increase the global burden of vector-borne diseases.

In many regions, these combined pressures may ultimately render areas increasingly difficult or impossible to inhabit.

Environmental and Social Determinants of Health Are Interconnected

The forces driving environmental degradation are closely tied to the same social and economic factors that shape health outcomes.

As a result, the current socio-ecological crisis is also a crisis of inequality. Communities that contribute the least to environmental damage often face the greatest health consequences.

This dynamic places particular burdens on:

  • Vulnerable populations

  • Indigenous communities

  • Low-income regions

  • Future generations

Delaying action is therefore not an option. Protecting biodiversity and restoring ecosystem functions are essential to safeguarding public health worldwide.

Why Nature-based Solutions for Improved Public Health Matter

A biosensitive approach to development recognizes that human wellbeing depends on living in balance with natural systems.

Transitioning toward a nature-positive economic framework can simultaneously strengthen ecosystems and support economic development. The World Economic Forum estimates that such a transition could generate $10.1 trillion in annual business value and create 395 million jobs by 2030.

Nature-based solutions for improved public health include strategies such as:

  • Reforestation and afforestation

  • Habitat protection and ecosystem restoration

  • Regenerative and restorative agricultural practices

  • Mangrove conservation

  • Expansion of urban green spaces

  • Protection of natural carbon sinks such as forests, oceans, wetlands, and peatlands

These approaches strengthen ecosystem resilience while reducing climate and health risks.

Indigenous Knowledge Is Essential for Sustainable Ecosystem Management

Effective environmental stewardship also requires recognizing the leadership and knowledge of Indigenous communities.

Indigenous groups have long practiced forms of land stewardship that promote biodiversity, ecosystem restoration, and sustainable environmental management.

Supporting Indigenous leadership in conservation efforts ensures that community-based solutions remain central to long-term environmental resilience.

A Global Call to Protect Nature for Public Health

The WFPHA supports the United Nations’ warning that humanity is “losing our suicidal war against nature” and emphasizes that the world faces a stark choice: collective action or collective suicide.

In response, the organization affirms the human right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment and calls for global commitment to nature-based climate solutions and ecosystem protection.

This call to action aligns with the principles of One Health, which recognizes the deep interdependence between human, animal, and environmental health, an interconnection highlighted clearly by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Path Forward

Protecting ecosystems is not solely an environmental responsibility; it is one of the most powerful public health interventions available.

Nature-based solutions for improved public health offer a pathway to:

  • Reduce climate risks

  • Prevent emerging diseases

  • Strengthen food and water security

  • Improve mental and physical well-being

  • Protect the health of future generations

The global public health community now faces a decisive moment. Acting to protect biodiversity and restore ecosystems is essential to ensuring a healthy and sustainable future for humanity.

Big Tobacco’s Dirty Tricks

Big Tobacco’s Dirty Tricks

Big Tobacco’s Dirty Tricks

News

Oct 6, 2022

Since its inception, the tobacco industry has been at the forefront of influencing public opinion and disrupting health policy through various sophisticated and deceptive methods. As evidence has mounted supporting the undisputed deadly effects of tobacco products, the industry has found ways to adapt and thrive. They have succeeded in attracting enough new smokers to support industry growth despite losing eight million of their consumers annually to tobacco-related deaths. The sphere of influence of multi-billion dollar tobacco companies extends to the fields of scientific research, politics, law, education, and the media.

The WFPHA Tobacco Control Working Group has published a casebook entitled Big Tobacco’s Dirty Tricks: A Casebook of Seven Key Tactics Used by the Tobacco Industry which contains seven articles discussing key tactics used by tobacco corporations to improve their brand, hinder their opponents, and undermine tobacco control measures globally. The cases provide insights into the industry’s methods as they trick, manipulate, bribe, and threaten in the eternal quest for profit. Each article outlines a particular tactic, demonstrates examples where it has occurred, and offers recommendations for how individuals, professionals, organizations and governments can recognize and counteract them.

To evaluate readers’ feedback on the articles and investigate attitudes toward the tobacco industry tactics, a brief survey is provided. The quick anonymous survey can be accessed with the link below.

The more informed our society is about the tactics used by Big Tobacco, the better chance we have of effectively imposing tobacco control measures, reducing consumption globally and preventing tobacco-related illness and death.